International relations: a hypothetical case study
In a hypothetical scenario, a rather nummy and extremely amusing but whorish male model sort of character flies into town for two days and makes it clear that he would love to see you, the word 'see' clearly being an euphemism for 'wild potentially illegal nookie of the sort that would make the neighbours in the next room demand a refund from the swanky hotel that they're staying." You are tempted by the offer but are mildly offended at the lack of any attempts at wining and dining and the presumption of sex on tap.
Do you: (a) reply tartly that you will be engaged in the very important task of saving lives and are therefore unavailable for his sexual gratification or (b) gleefully start picking out which lingerie you'd like to be torn away from your willing body like the floozy that you are?
Discuss!
5 Comments:
- Miss Lam commented:
For some reason that made me laugh. I would choose (a) for fear of post-coital rage.
- » January 07, 2010 12:41 AM
- Gabriel commented:
(b) because i'm gay and would engage with yummy men at the drop of the hat. and then wake up the next morning angry with myself for being such a whore.
- » January 08, 2010 5:32 PM
- commented:
(c) get a douche spray because that's what my mum said i should do. it helps calm the "itch" down.
- » January 09, 2010 9:38 PM
- Slinky commented:
Grisabella - I love that phrase, 'post-coital rage'. It would be a great name for a band.
Gabes - You slut. PS:I love your blog!
Timo - guess who's not getting their Home & Decor when I come back? BITCH.- » January 11, 2010 10:38 PM
- commented:
NOoooOOO. Not the home decor...
OKAY: (b)...
a sexually satiated female (and sometimes male - but that's incredibly hard to do) is always much more amenable to doing wonderful favours like muling over decor magazines.- » January 13, 2010 1:19 AM